November 12th, 2015

Boy Scouts of America and gay pedophilia.



Why does US "mainstream press" for years condemned the Catholic Church for allowing predatory homosexuals to destroy the lives of boys, while simultaneously condemning the Boy Scouts of America for not allowing precisely the same thing in their organization?

On July 27, 2015, the Boy Scouts of America (BSA) National Executive Board voted 45-12 to lift the organization’s ban on gay adult leaders and employees.

Two months before, BSA President (and former defense secretary in the Obama and Bush administrations) Robert Gates already had sent a signal. Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s 2000 ruling in Boy Scouts of America v. Dale that BSA, and all similar private voluntary organizations, have the constitutionally protected right under the First Amendment of freedom of association to set membership standards, Gates nevertheless declared that it was time to end the ban on “gay” leaders because it “cannot be sustained” any longer.

BSA’s lifting of its ban means that homosexual men who are sexually attracted to young boys are now welcome in a national organization of over 2.6 million Scouts, whose activities include campouts where the leaders are in intimate proximity to the boys.

Even before the ban was lifted, there have been countless cases of sexual abuse of Scouts.

According to Stephen Baldwin, in 1993, BSA was ordered to turn over 25,000 pages of documents to the plaintiff — a California family who sued BSA for exposing their son to a Scout leader who had molested him. The documents revealed that thousands of boys had been molested by Scout leaders and other volunteers between 1971 and 1991 resulting in the expulsion of over 1,800 Scout volunteers for pedophilia. Some Scout leaders molested over 40 boys before getting caught. Many, once caught, simply moved to a different Scout troop and continued abusing boys.

Note: Stephen Baldwin is a long time author, researcher, and speaker on homosexual issues, and the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, D.C. Elected to the California State Assembly in 1994, Baldwin chaired the Assembly Education Committee where he fought the homosexual community’s efforts to insert pro-gay curriculum into California’s public schools.

Baldwin’s assertion is corroborated by Minneapolis Post, which reported that on October 19, 2012, forced by another court order, BSA released over 20,000 pages of documentation on 1,200 reported child sexual abuse cases within the organization in 20 years, from 1965 to 1985.

The latest BSA sex abuse lawsuit was filed by a man, John Doe 153, who accuses BSA for failing to protect him decades ago against a former St. Paul adult scout leader, Leland “Lee” Opalinski. The lawsuit claims that Opalinski repeatedly had “sexual contact … [and] penetration” with JD153 when he was 12 to 16 years old. Opalinski has been named in three other civil suits against BSA.

Source: http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2015/08/boy-scouts-of-america-goes-homo-despite-evidence-of-homosexuals-being-more-prone-to-pedophilia-3039072.html



Although most homosexual activists publicly deny that they want access to boys, many homosexual groups around the world are working aggressively to lower the age of sexual consent. Their cause is being aided by the professional psychiatric and psychological associations, which have moved n recent years toward normalizing pedophilia, much as they did with homosexuality in the early 1970s.

Kevin Bishop, an admitted pederast (pedophile), is promoting the work of the North American /Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in South Africa. Bishop, who was molested at the age of six, is also an admitted homosexual who is blunt about the relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia. "Scratch the average homosexual and you will find a pedophile," said Bishop in an interview with the Electronic Mail & Guardian (June 30, 1997).1 (1. Angella Johnson, “The man who loves to love boys,” Electronic Mail & Guardian, June 30, 1997, http://www.mg.co.za/mg.)

This pedophile/homosexual activist began studying pedophilia while a student at Rhodes University. He also discovered Karl Marx there, as well as other literature that helped form his worldview. His views are being echoed around the world by homosexual activists who are seeking what they call "sexual freedom" for children.

Bishop is on a crusade in South Africa to have "age of sexual consent laws" abolished, and he is looking for help from NAMBLA to accomplish his goal. He says children must be empowered "by teaching them about loving relationships at an early age, and giving them the opportunity to make an informed decision about having [sex]." He also approves of incest, noting, "Two women psychologists in America say the healthiest introduction to sex for a child should be with their [sic] parents, because it is less threatening and the emotional intimacy more comfortable." 2 (2.Ibid)

Bishop agrees with NAMBLA that the next social movement in Western politics will be an attack m "sexual ageism," which prohibits sexual contact based on age differences. The movement already is well under way in Europe and Canada.

Homosexuals did not need scientific evidence, neither do pedophiles.

The public approval of homosexuality and the idea of homosexuals "marrying" would have been unheard of thirty years ago. But the homosexual campaign's success did not depend on rightness or on scientific evidence - but in its image, and on the increasing permissiveness of society. Dr John Money of John HopKins University has urged pedophiles not to be discouraged by the lack of evidence backing up their cause. He says:

"When the gay rights activists became politically active, there wasn't a sufficient body of scientific information for them to base their gay activism on. So, you don't have to have a basic body of scientific information in order to decide to work actively for a particular ideology. As long as you're prepared to be put in Jail. Isn't that how social change has always taken place?"

This quote comes from the "scholarly" Dutch journal, Paidika -A Journal of pedophilia. ( ) If homosexuality has been posed as healthy, good and normal, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, so can pedophilia. Pro-pedophilic articles are making their way into academia.

SOURCE: Africa Christian Action
Book: The PinkAgenda: Sexual Revolution in South Africa and the Ruin of the Family
By Christine MC Cafferty with Peter Hammond

PEDOPHILIA IN THE UNITED STATES

In the United States, homosexual activists are more circumspect about their efforts to gain access to children than they are in Canada or Europe. While NAMBLA has regularly marched in homosexual pride parades in New York, San Francisco and other major cities, homosexual activists publicly disassociate themselves from pedophiles as part of a public relations strategy.

Yet homosexual groups are actively recruiting gay youth" through such groups as The Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League, the HettrickMartin Institute, AIDS service providers and various agencies that assist runaways. A concerted effort to change age-of-consent laws has not yet emerged, but some ominous signs portend an eventual effort. When Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was an attorney for the ACLU, she co-authored a report recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age." ).3 (3 "Sex Bias in the U.S. Code," Report for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, April 1977, p. 102, quoted in "Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Feminist World View," The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Vol. 26, No. 12, Section 1, p.3. The paragraph reads as follows: '"Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years" and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense.... A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person.... [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old..)

The public still has a revulsion against child sexual abuse. In fact, whenever there is an attempt to show a connection between pedophiles and homosexuality, the standard response from the activists is that as many as 97 percent of all pedophiles are heterosexuals and/or married men. Thus, they deflect attention away from their own proclivities to have sex with children.

There is some truth to the claim that many pedophiles are heterosexually oriented men. To be accurate, pedophilia is the crime of sexually molesting a child of the opposite sex. Pederasty, on the other hand, is the crime of molesting a child of the same sex. The term pedophile is used as a general term to describe a person who molests any child, and the term pedophilia, however, is commonly used to refer to child sexual abuse in general. The homosexual who molests a child of the same sex, therefore, technically is guilty of pederasty, rather than pedophilia - yet both are child sexual abuse.

Homosexuals deny that there is a high incidence of child molestation among them, but the statistics tell another story.

First, we need to look at the statistics on child sexual abuse in general. The National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse (NCPCA) has published the following information:

1. Reports of sexual abuse are on the increase in our nation.

2. Between 80 and 95 percent of all child molestation’s are committed by men. The NCPCA notes, however, that there is a "dramatic increase in the number of adolescent offenders who have committed sexually aggressive acts against other children."

3. Girls are more likely to be the victims of molestation than boys. Males account for 25 to 35 percent of child sexual abuse victims.4 (4. "Child Sexual Abuse, "National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, December 1996, http://www.childabuse.org)

How prevalent is child molestation among homosexuals?

The Gay Report, published by homosexual researchers Jay and Young in 1979, revealed that 73 percent of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys 16 to 19 years of age or younger.5 (5. K. Jay and A. Young, The Gay Report (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275. )

Although homosexuals account for less than two percent of the population. they constitute about a third of child molesters.6 (6. K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "The Proportions of Heterosexual and Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 18 (Spring 1992): 3443, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia," op. cit. Also, K. Freund and R.I. Watson, "Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality," Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 10 (Fall 1984): 197, cited in NARTH Fact Sheet. ) Further, as noted by the Encino, Calif.-based National Association for research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), "since homosexual pedophiles victimize far more children than do heterosexual pedophiles, it is estimated that approximately 80 percent or pedophile victims are boys who have been molested by adultmales.7 (7. Thomas Schmidt, Straight and Narrow? Compassion and Clarity in the Homosexuality Debate (Downers Grove, IU.: Intervarsity Press), p. 114, cited in "The Problem of Pedophilia, op. cit., p. 2. )

A nationwide investigation of child molestation in the Boy Scouts from 1971 to 1991 revealed that more than 2,000 boys reported molestations by adult Scout leaders. (Note: The Scouts, who have 150,000 Scoutmasters and assistant Scoutmasters, ban hundreds of men each year from scouting out of concern that they might abuse boys.)8 (8. Patrick Boyle, Scout's Honor (Rocklin, Calif.: Prima Publishing, 1994), p. 3l6. )

A study of Canadian pedophiles has shown that 30 percent of those studied admitted to having engaged In homosexual acts as adults, and 91 percent of the molesters of non-familial boys admitted to no lifetime sexual contact other than homosexual.9 (9. W. L. Marshall, et al., "Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters," Journal of interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336, cited in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't Want You to see," Colorado for Family Values Report, Vol. 14, March 1994. )

Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., and Charles B. Johnson, Ph.D., conducted a content study of the personal ads in the Advocate, the national gay and lesbian newsmagazine and discovered that "chickens," a common term for underage boys sought for sex, were widely solicited. Many of the advertisements in the magazine solicited boys and teens from within a larger pool of prostitution ads.10 (10. Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., "A Content Analysis of 'The Advocate,"' unpublished manuscript p. 18, quoted in "Pedophilia: The Part of Homosexuality They Don't WantYou to See," ibid. ) The authors also note a statement from a book review by homosexual activist Larry Kramer that the work, "like much canonized male homosexual literature, involves sexually predatory white men on the prowl for dark-skinned boys to gratify them.11 (11. From "Lany Kramer's Reading List," The Advocate, January 24, 1995, p. 99, cited in "Status Report," The Reisman & Johnson Report of Partner Solicitation Characteristics as a Reflection of More Sexual Orientation and the Threat to Children, First Principles Press, January l995.)
In a 1985 study of the rates of molestation among homosexual pederasts compared to heterosexu1 pedophiles, Dr. Paul Cameron found the following:

153 pederasts had sexually molested 22,981 boys over an average period of 22 years.

224 pedophiles had molested 4,435 girls over an average period of 18 years.

The average pederast molested an average of 150 boys, and each heterosexual pedophile molested an average of 20 girls, a ratio of 7.5 to one. 12 (12. Dr. Paul Cameron, “Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil,” Psychological Reports 57 (1985): 1227-1236.)
GOING AFTER CHILDREN
Gaining access to children has been a long-term goal of the homosexual movement. In 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a 'Gay Rights Platform" that included the following demand: "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent." David Thorstad, a spokesman for the homosexual rights movement and NAMBLA, clearly states the objectives: 'The ultimate goal of the gay liberation movement is the achievement of sexual freedom for all - not just equal rights for 'lesbians and gay men, but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children." This goal has not changed since it was articulated in 1972.

Enrique T. Rueda, The Homosexual Network (Old Greenwhich, Connecticut: The Devin Adair Company, 1982), p. 201

AGE OF CONSENT
Homosexual organizations around the world have embarked upon a vigorous campaign to lower actual age of consent laws by claiming that current laws are discriminatory against homosexuals. In England, for example, a major push is underway to lower the age of sexual consent for homosexuals to 14. OutRage!, a homosexual organization that operates much like ACT UP in the United States, has been leading the crusade. In a statement published on the Queer Intelligence Service website, OutRage! claims that "under-age queers have rights too. They are some of the most vulnerable members of our community. We have a special responsibility to protect their interests and welfare.

Peter Tatchell, "Why We Want an Age of Consent of 14," Queer Intelligence Service, Agenda for Gay Law Reform, OutRage.!, London, Sept. 10, 1998, http://www.OutRage.cygnet.co.uk.

SOURCE: Frank V. York and Robert H. Knight, "Homosexual Activists Work To Normalize Sex With Boys"

ENTER NAMBLA (NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION)

"NAMBLA is nothing more or less than an egregious organization of pedophiles."- Mike Echols in the L.A. Times 3/11/92

According to their website, NAMBLA's goal is to end the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships by:
building understanding and support for such relationships; educating the general public on the benevolent nature of man/boy love; cooperating with lesbian, gay, feminist, and other liberation movements; supporting the liberation of persons of all ages from sexual prejudice and oppression. Their membership is open to everyone sympathetic to man/boy love and personal freedom.

NAMBLA EXPOSED

In 1991 NAMBLA had over 3,000 members. However, that was prior to January 1992 when Mike Echols went to San Francisco’s KRON-TV (NBC) and worked with Jon Dann, Greg Lyon, and Craig Franklin of Target 4 News to take a hidden camera and audio wire into NAMBLA’s January 4th public meeting in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill Public Library. The resulting video and news of this meeting led to the organization’s exposure on KRON-TV News… a story which ran for 18 days straight. And this video along with interviews of Echols were featured on CNN and Geraldo Rivera’s syndicated tabloid TV show “NOW It Can Be Told.”

Gay pedophilia as a part of homosexual culture in US.





In the United States, homosexual activists are more circumspect about their efforts to gain access to children than they are in Canada or Europe. While NAMBLA has regularly marched in homosexual pride parades in New York, San Francisco and other major cities, homosexual activists publicly disassociate themselves from pedophiles as part of a public relations strategy.

Yet homosexual groups are actively recruiting gay youth" through such groups as The Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League, the HettrickMartin Institute, AIDS service providers and various agencies that assist runaways. A concerted effort to change age-of-consent laws has not yet emerged, but some ominous signs portend an eventual effort.

There are reportedly over 1000 school "gay" clubs in US. Moreover according to several groups that "support" homosexual teens and their parents, sex between a young teen and an adult is just an expected part of the growing up process. In a long-term study of materials recommended for reading by Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), and Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), you can find numerous stories and episodes of adult-teen homosexual sex. Incidents are treated at times in a neutral fashion, or too often, in a positive light -- as if such abusive relationships are natural, normal and even an advantageous "coming of age" step in the lives of "gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered" youth.

Moreover, books recommended by GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network full of pedophile's propaganda. In its reading recommendations, young teens having homosexual sex, sometimes with an adult, were common. And of course, adverse consequences are rare in these stories – no diseases, criminal prosecution of adult predators or emotional trauma. It’s truly a pedophile’s dream, where abused children “choose” to have early sex. Children at Risk: GLSEN and Youth Corruption.

Another CDC study shows us that “gay, bisexual and questioning” youth were much more likely to report having had sexual intercourse before age 13, as well as having had more than four sex partners, compared to students who identified as heterosexual. Sexual Identity, Sex of Sexual Contacts, and Health-Risk Behaviors Among Students in Grades 9--12 --- Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance, Selected Sites, United States, 2001--2009

Gay press promotes sex with children

In 1995 the homosexual magazine “Guide” said, “We can be proud that the gay movement has been home to the few voices who have had the courage to say out loud that children are naturally sexual” and “deserve the right to sexual expression with whoever they choose. …” The article went on to say: “Instead of fearing being labeled pedophiles, we must proudly proclaim that sex is good, including children’s sexuality … we must do it for the children’s sake.”

Larry Kramer, the founder of ACT-UP, a noted homosexual activist group, wrote in his book, “Report from the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist”: “In those instances where children do have sex with their homosexual elders, be they teachers or anyone else, I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it.”

In a study of advertisements in the influential homosexual newspaper, The Advocate, Reisman found ads for a “Penetrable Boy Doll … available in three provocative positions. She also found that the number of erotic boy images in each issue of The Advocate averaged 14.

The editorial board of the leading pedophile academic journal, Paidika, is dominated by prominent homosexual scholars such as San Francisco State University professor John DeCecco, who happens to edit the Journal of Homosexuality. That is why this media rarely described child sexual abuse as “homosexual” or “gay” activity – even though the worst incidents involved male-to-male contact, accusing mostly straight males.

The Journal of Homosexuality in 2002 published a special double-issue entitled, “Male Intergenerational Intimacy”, containing many articles portraying sex between men and minor boys as loving relationships. One article said parents should look upon the pedophile who loves their son “not as a rival or competitor, not as a theft of their property, but as a partner in the boy’s upbringing, someone to be welcomed into their home.”

Gay activists have strenuously argued that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children. They point out that the majority of child molestation cases are by heterosexuals.

But they neglect a pivotal fact: Homosexuals comprise only a small percentage of the population, yet account for an extraordinarily high percentage of offenses against children.

Now consider a report from the Journal of Sex Research which noted that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses, even though they are outnumbered by heterosexuals 50 to one. Less than two percent of the population commits one-third of the offenses against children!

US Media for years also ignored brutal murders commited by Homosexuals. For example, murder of Jesse Dirkhising. In the small town of Rogers, Arkansas, 13-year-old Jesse died a horrible death at the hands of two sodomites and almost nobody heard about it.

After their arrest, one of the men confessed that he sneaked up on the boy from behind, bound and gagged him and sodomized him repeatedly while the other man watched and gave instructions. After taking a break to eat a sandwich, they noticed that Jesse had stopped breathing. Police chief Tim Keck called the case one of the most brutal he has seen. How strange that this hideous murder committed by homosexuals has been virtually ignored by the news media. Source: Media ignoring crimes by homosexuals.

But why US media ignore horrible homosexual crimes and who stays behind these media resources? The National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA) recently boasted that although homosexuals are less than two percent of the population, three-fourths of the people who decide the content of the front page of the New York Times are homosexual. I must recall that New York Times is the biggest US print media, owned and controlled by Jews. Same situation with other media. Jewish Americans with pro-gay views run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates: Fox News, Paramount Pictures, Walt Disney, Sony Pictures, Warner Brothers, CBS, MGM, and NBC/Universal Studios.

What is Putin up to in Syria? Nothing good. And nothing new.





Putinist Russia is like a bad funhouse mirror for Western politics: many of the same actions, but cruder and without the elaborate justifications. That’s crucial for propping up his corrupt authoritarian regime when Russians are suffering isolation and economic recession.

Finally, Mr. Putin appears to calculate that the image of a strong Russia taking a leading role on international crises will play well domestically. Perhaps, but military involvement in Syria carries big risks: Russia could get pulled into a quagmire, and a recent Levada poll shows that 69 percent of Russians oppose sending troops to Syria.

Putin’s Russia is also an “information-based dictatorship,” which draws its legitimacy from the support of the television-watching public. As intervention in Ukraine has deteriorated into a nasty intractable mess, “The War on ISIL” is meant to be a new popular TV series in which Russia again bravely fights terrorists and outwits the West. As ever with Putin, this looks more like short-term showmanship than long-term strategy.

In Putin’s media world, the United States caused the current “civil” war in Ukraine by supporting the protests there. And he is convinced the Americans supported the nationalist protests in Russia in 2011-2012 and only Putin’s firm hand averted disaster. So there is a deep identification with dictator Assad at play in Syria.

I think it’s worthwhile to remember that, for the Kremlin, Ukraine remains the number one concern. In the short term, Vladimir Putin’s air offensive in Syria will help Bashar al-Assad retain power. But in the long term, it seems Russia’s presence there is a bargaining chip. Putin has already ended Russia’s diplomatic isolation over Ukraine and scored a meeting with Barack Obama. What’s being discussed behind the scenes? Recognition of Russia’s interests in Ukraine? An end date for sanctions, applied as a punishment because of Crimea annexation? It’s all suddenly on the table now.

The soap opera in Ukraine is put on hold. The heroic separatists with communist stripes, their evil Ukrainian fascist foes, and the cynical Western meddlers have been retired. The new entertainment is a thrilling and exotic epic set in Syria, with the Assad regime as the heroic defenders of civilized values, Russian their valiant allies and the West as the defenders of jihadist barbarians.

Like most soap operas, this plot bears little relation to reality. A peace deal in Syria is possible—but Russia cannot broker or enforce it. That won’t happen, so in the meantime Syria bleeds, Europe quails at the seemingly unstoppable influx of migrants, and Mr Putin chuckles.

His second aim is achieved too. For all its military, diplomatic and economic weakness, Russia has re-established itself as an indispensable power, with which the West must deal—and on Russia’s terms.

But you must not misunderstand Mr. Putin’s mindset. He does not worry about Russia’s long-term economic health. He sees politics as a ruthless zero-sum game in which victory goes to the player with the strongest nerves and fastest movements.

President Putin appears to have multiple objectives with his military offensive in Syria. For the last year he has been looking for a possible short victorious war after his war in Donbas turned out to be neither victorious and nor short. He needed a diversionary maneuver to downplay the failure of the war in eastern Ukraine, so that he can let it slow down. After a lot of trial and error, he seems to have settled for Syria, which has many advantages. The United States has no clear policy, and Europe cannot even think of a policy while being flooded with Syrian refugees. Assad is Russia’s oldest and closest ally. Together with Iran, Russia can shore him up. A Russian Shiite alliance with Iraq and Iran embarrasses the United States. Putin can bomb the at least 2,500 Russian citizens that fight with ISIL. Putin can thus push the United States and Europe to closer interaction with Russia.

But this tactic has serious shortcomings.

The central goal of any campaign against terrorism in Syria must be to divide Isil from the country’s Sunni majority. If Sunnis are forced to choose between Isil and the rule of Assad – a foreign-backed Alawite dictator who has committed every possible atrocity, up to and including the gassing of children – then many will make a decision that we might find uncomfortable.

Nothing would be more likely to rally popular support for Isil than helping Assad to reconquer Syria. The vision of an army backed by Shia Iran and Christian Russia bearing down on Sunnis in the Arabian heartland would fulfil the millenarian fantasies of the most ardent Isil zealot. At a stroke its pitiless worldview would seem to be vindicated.

The only answer is what it has always been: Assad’s departure allowing the birth of a united front against Isil. But the half measures of the West have created a vacuum into which Putin has stepped.

In truth, fighting Isil has never been a priority for Assad. A study conducted by IHS Jane’s, a defence consultancy, found that of 982 operations launched by the regime’s forces in 2014, only 6 per cent targeted Isil. This was the year when Isil overran swathes of eastern Syria, seizing valuable oilfields and their de facto capital, Raqqa.

While this was happening, Assad was hurling 94 per cent of his military effort against the other rebel movements. When Isil advanced, they often captured territory not from the regime but from rival insurgents. By using barrel bombs, chlorine gas and strike aircraft against the rebels in Isil’s path, Assad actually helped the terrorists to gain ground.

Assad’s forces have killed at least 11,000 civilians by using helicopters to drop barrels packed with explosives, shrapnel and flammable liquid. French authorities have launched a criminal probe against the Assad regime for alleged war crimes committed between 2011 and 2013, sources told a news agency on Tuesday night.

The weapons that Russia is sending there are not an attempt to settle the conflict. They are there to protect the Assad regime, which is its cause. Moreover, ISIL does not have warplanes: Russia’s air defense missiles are in Syria for a different purpose.

Secretary of Defense Ash Carter proclaimed that the Russian strikes “were in areas where there were not ISIL forces.”

Russian jets have bombed targets in the provinces of Homs, Hama, Idlib and Aleppo, in areas where Isis has no presence, and where opposition groups, including some backed by the US and Gulf states, hold sway. A member of the local governing council in Daarat al-Izza, a town in Aleppo thatwas hit on Friday, said they have not had an Isis presence for a year and a half. The attack targeted a communication centre at the edge of the town belonging to one of the opposition factions. Paris prosecutors opened a preliminary war crimes inquiry on September 15, a source close to the case and a diplomatic source said.

Paris prosecutors opened a preliminary war crimes inquiry on September 15, a source close to the case and a diplomatic source said.

Source http://www.politico.eu/article/putin-really-up-to-in-syria-experts-analysis-moscow-strategy/

Oil prices are the key reason for Russian intervention in Syria.

The Putin's "war on terror" in Syria is a massive fraud based on deception and illusion. Oil prices were the key reason for Putinist Russia to enter into Syrian conflict. Oil and gas sales bring in nearly 50 percent of Russia’s government revenues; they also account for 70% percent of Russia’s export proceeds. Russian nominal GDP due to the fall of oil and gas prices has shrunk more than twice since 2014. Now it is likely that Italy, India, Canada, Spain and Australia and even New York city, are all more economically significant than Russia. Moscow is so dependent on oil sales to keep its economy chugging along that Russia is estimated to lose $2 billion in potential sales for every dollar the price of oil drops.

Before Putin intervened in Syrian conflict, he tried to settle the deal with Saudis. Saudi officials met with Russian bigwigs during August 2015 to settle the deal over Syria and oil prices. No doubt the Saudis offered to boost oil-prices in return for Moscow disavowing Assad. But sides didn’t produce the right outcome for either side. After that, the Saudi King meets with President Obama and announces Saudi support for the Iran nuke deal. Then Moscow begins to fly in Russian tanks and perhaps 1000 troops to Syria, and possibly some leading-edge fighter jets and anti-aircraft missiles. After his plan to reason with Saudis over oil prices failed, Putin desperately needs to create chaos in the Middle East in order to rise the oil prices.

That is why the main target of Russian forces in Syria is not ISIS, the main target is uncompromising and well-armed enemy of Assad - Saudi Arabia.

Now Putin creates a dome of air defense of Syria - certainly not to fight ISIS. This is to ensure that as soon as possible to fill up a couple of the Saudi aircraft in air combat, having lost at least one own and get an excellent casus belli. Then it is easy to guess about retaliation of Syrian (Russian) aviation. And there they will hit?

They'll hit at oil pipes. In the end, oil prices will rise considerably. Russian budget consists on 50% from oil and gas taxes. That is the main reason for intervention. But that is hard variant, because US has military bases there. Much better and safer variant for him is to transfer ISIS terrorist activities to Iraq or Saudi Arabia, where terrorists can hit oil pipes, which in turn will give Russia additional hundreds of billions dollars in potential oil and gas export revenue.

The war in Syria has begun multistage. Goals for Putin set sweeter to one another in the event of achievement. The rise in oil prices, the humiliation of Obama and even the Pentagon with it's fleet and army. Putin also tries tо inspire terrorism in Europe and send there millions of muslim refugees who in short help him to destroy European Union and weaken Nato in Europe. That is a complete reversal of the chessboard with a possibility to restore old Soviet borders in Europe.

Putin has no equal to him on the aspirations of players in this field. Cowardice of western leaders will ruin our world!