September 28th, 2015

Obama Instituted the Greatest Transfer of Wealth to the Zionist bankers.

During Obama’s presidency some $4.5 trillion was given to Wall Street banks through its Quantitative Easing program, with the American people picking up the IOU.

Instead of all that money going into real, tangible things like desperately needed infrastructure improvements, those trillions were sequestered in a crony system of Zionist banks and Wall St. investors, overseen by a Jewish cartel called the Federal Reserve.

After the 2008 election, Obamacare became the next massive distraction, keeping everyone in a state of phony debate while the Fed was doling out trillions to Wall St. banks and putting American taxpayers on the hook. And it just so happened that Obamacare became a windfall for another power player in the corporatocracy—the health insurance industry.

These actions are the reasons why national debt approaching 17 trillion and the American middle class has been decimated so severely that it no longer makes up the majority of the population. The middle class has seen the wholesale export of good-paying jobs, while on the hook for crushing mortgages and higher taxes to pay down the growing US debt to fund the banks.”

Jobs, wages, and the GDP took a back seat to the “too big to fail” Wall St. banks, because they couldn’t trust the plebes with all that money for fear of inflation. As a result, the various schemes these banks engaged in with the free money—including mortgage-backed securities, company mergers, company debt offerings, stock buybacks—did nothing but secure that wealth for the Jewish oligarchs.

The gap between rich and poor has widened more under Obama than under any other president.

Today, the liberal Left bombards America with pro-Black propaganda.

Today, the liberal Left bombards America with pro-Black propaganda. The post modernists have been letting huge numbers of Black African immigrants into the country.

In this author’s home town an entire section of the city has been overrun by wild robe wearing Blacks that can’t speak a word of the English language.

Multiculturalists expect us to believe that these strange brown people dressed like medieval jesters are the future of our magnanimous Western civilization. 

As citizens concerned for the future of our communities and the safety of our posterity the question should be asked: can Blacks sustain White Western society with all its complex institutions and cultural expressions?

Christians should not stand idly by and accept the destruction of our faith's civilization; as it would benefit neither the world nor Christ's followers. Christians must ask tough questions.

For anyone willing to look, there is a massive amount of data upon which to construct answers.

No historical truth is more certain than that the Black race is incapable of sustaining civilization.

Evaluating the history of the now ruined city of Detroit, the now ruined continent of Africa, and the now ruined island of Haiti while comparing them with Japan and Puerto Rico should give anyone the evidence they need to decide upon the ability of Blacks to sustain White civilization.


Once the largest factory in the world. Today, the Packard Plant (Detroit) stands in ruin.

Due to White flight vast areas of cities around America have been abandoned to Black residents. The most amazing example of this situation is the city of Detroit. After WWII, Detroit was one of the most prosperous cities in the world. It was given the nickname ‘Paris of North America.’

In 1950 the city was the 5th largest in the country, with a population of 1,849,568. At the peak of the cities prestige (1940) non-Hispanic Whites made up 90.4% of the population. Ever since the middle of the last century Detroit’s White European population has shrunk considerably, and with it the reputation and importance of the city.

Today, Blacks make up 89% of the population of Detroit (a near complete reversal of 1940) and the city has diminished to 701,500 inhabitants.

In only a few years White flight caused the complete handover of one of the most distinguished cities in the world from the White race to the Black.

One of the significant reasons for the rapid exodus of the Whites from the city was Black violence. Negro crime was exemplified by the 12th Street Riot, the second largest and most destructive riot in U.S. history. Whites, fearing for their lives, fled Detroit and left one of the most prosperous cities on earth in the hands of Blacks.

Consider the commentary offered by prominent Black economist Thomas Sowell:

‘Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit's black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent. It was not despair that fueled the riot. It was the riot which marked the beginning of the decline of Detroit to its current state of despair. Detroit's population today is only half of what it once was, and its most productive people have been the ones who fled.’

Sowell concedes that racial violence didn’t break out because Blacks were in a terrible economic situation, in fact, the opposite was true. This point alone speaks volumes about multi-ethnic states, but that is another book unto itself.

The importance of Detroit’s historical situation is that in the last 60 years of the city’s history we have a nearly perfect case-study of what happens when current Western prosperity and institutions are handed over to members of the Black race. Detroit is exemplary in that it was not handed over to a degenerate brand of Blacks but, as Thomas Sowell said, the most prosperous Black people in the country (arguably the world).

The story of the decline and fall of Detroit is well known, and anyone who is interested should be encouraged to research it. The collapse of Detroit following its White population’s replacement by members of the Black race is so dramatic as to be almost unbelievable.

Detroit has fallen so far since the 1950s that today it is commonly cited as a post-apocalyptic environment. The landscape of Detroit is characterized by its remarkable similarity to a vacant dilapidated world in which humanity has suddenly been struck by a cataclysmic event throwing society into anarchy and causing the deaths of millions of people.

In 2010 the History Channel aired a documentary called Apocalypse Man in which host Rudy Reyes showed viewers how to deal with scenarios one might face after a catastrophic event suddenly ended civilization… the documentary was filmed in the ruins of Detroit.

Just recently, an ingenious entrepreneur presented plans for turning the deserted dilapidated warehouses and neighborhoods of Detroit into a new kind of theme park called Zombie World(or ‘Z World’). He sold the idea with the slogan: ‘everyone wants to live through a zombie apocalypse at least once.’ Several major news organizations (TIME, Detroit Free Press, LA Times, etc.) debated the plan with positive feedback.

In an even more startling development  in 2012 the city was in such bad shape that the Mayor unveiled a plan to bulldoze (raze) 25% of it! However, Detroit was so broke that the U.S. government had to give them 20 million dollars of federal stimulus money in order to start the demolitions.

In 2009 it was reported that the city had nearly run out of food, and that groceries were being unloaded under the surveillance of armed military fatigued guards. In fact, Detroit does not have a single supermarket, which forces its residence to get food at corner stores or discount chains.

The real unemployment rate of the city is 50%.

Dave Schultz a Police Crime Prevention Examiner for the city had this to say about the state of law and order in 2012 Detroit : ‘The city is a virtual war zone and the Detroit Police Department is helpless at this time.’

Shortly after that admission was made the Black Detroit police Chief Ralph Godbee wasforced to resign after handing out promotions in exchange for sexual services.

It was reported that there was so much corruption involved that the Detroit Police Department had been turned into a ‘brothel.’

On October 8th 2012 Detroit police officers began handing out flyers to citizens that read: ‘Enter Detroit at Your Own Risk…Detroit is America’s most violent city. Detroit’s homicide rate is the highest in the country. Detroit’s Police Department is grossly understaffed.’

Commenting on the flyers police union attorney Donato Lorio said: ‘The DPOA believes that there is a war in Detroit, but there should be a war on crime, not a war on its officers.’

Even though Detroit spends thousands of dollars per student for its school systems only a dismal 50% of the population can read!

It's not really surprising when the president of the school board is functionally illiterate.

Wikipedia has an entire entry entitled 'The Decline of Detroit.'

Some conservatives claim that the decline of Detroit is due to its liberal policy ideology rather than the racial group that now inhabits it.

But if this is the case why is Pittsburg, Pennsylvania a city ravaged by the collapse of the steel industry still considered a great place to live? Pittsburg is overwhelmingly liberal.

The answer is obvious: Pittsburg is overwhelmingly White.

Why are Vermont, Maine, and Oregon such stellar places to live despite their socialist leanings?

Because all of those places have predominantly White populations.

This author has lived in Columbus, Ohio. Occasionally I get the ‘privilege’ of driving through the less pretty sides of town. I often see once beautiful mansions built during the glory days of the city. Now, they are miserable ruins obviously neglected for decades and the neighborhoods they reside in are predominantly Black communities (if community can even be used to describe them).

Some might retort that the ruined mansions of Columbus are old and this is why they have become dilapidated. To that I would respond that the oldest residential part of the city, German Village, is a thriving upscale neighborhood that is now inhabited almost entirely by Whites.

German Village itself had been ransacked by Blacks for many years and had become little more than a ghetto slum, but through a gentrification process that pushed the Blacks out with higher living costs the area has been returned to its former era of beauty and prosperity - an era which corresponded precisely with the return of White people.

This kind of experience has been repeated in different cities and suburbs all across the country. Anyone can open their eyes and see examples of Blacks being incapable of sustaining the civilization Whites have given them.

Wherever there is a Black majority there is also crime, ruin, and economic disintegration. It would be a challenge (probably impossible) to name a single predominantly Black area that most people would feel comfortable sending their children at night. Even more challenging, finding a single Black area where the average middle class American would want to live?

Even the nicest ‘Black neighborhoods’ aren’t majority Black.


Africans wander through the ruins of a hotel abandoned after the end of White colonial rule.

In the late 1800s Africa was still a mysterious continent about which little was known. There were no civilizations with which the European peoples communicated, there had never been any great armies that had marched out of the interior of that dark land, and there had never been anything on the other side of the continent that would warrant trade routes through it. Africa was largely viewed as a massive land obstacle around which the great European merchants must travel to reach the wealthy and prosperous people groups of the Far East.

Africa was such a barbarous undeveloped area that upon reaching it by ship in the early 1400s the Chinese ceased world exploration because they concluded, after seeing the savage Blacks, that the rest of world must be filled with naked barbarians.

After squabbling for every other piece of the globe, however, the White empires of Europe had little where else to conquer but the continent to the south of them. Leopold II of Belgium took over the Congo region and consolidated it in 1890. The Scramble for Africa was on. Britain, France, Germany, and Italy began a decade’s long squabble to establish their own imperial prestige in Africa.
The African natives were little more than a nuisance along the European path to controlling the entire continent.

Once in the hands of the empires of Europe administrations set about to make the African colonies prosperous for the mother countries and their inhabitants. They built railroads, mines, plantations, and attempted to educate the native tribal peoples so as to make them useful in the new Western system that Africa had been thrust into.

Africa was (and still is) bursting with natural resources: diamonds, gold, cobalt, oil, and timber. These resources had never been utilized by the uncivilized Blacks. The Europeans developed these industries and taught the natives how to utilize them.

In the 1960s much of Africa gained its independence from Europeans. When the African states launched into independence they were the subject of incredible interest. The United States and Soviet Union attempted to gain influence over every newly freed state, considering each one an invaluable asset.

Since Europeans had arrived in Africa the native Blacks had been experiencing steadily better living conditions. Only a few decades after their self rule began, however, that trend was dramatically reversed as ruthless egomaniac dictators rose to power, AIDS ravished the continent, starvation set it, and civil wars ripped the region apart.

Today, Africa is a far cry from what it was when the European empires released those new ‘nations’ into independence. Africa has become synonymous with unfathomable underdevelopment, misery, and death.

I recently went to my grandmother’s house and the topic turned to my missionary great-uncle in Ghana. This uncle sends emails to my grandparents about life in Africa.

Recently, he sent an email about how the natives often cook parts of chickens for a meal and then days later eat the leftovers by simply scraping the maggots off the carcass. My grandfather said: ‘I Just cannot comprehend how the people in Africa are so far behind?!

My grandmother chimed in: ‘I just recently saw a website that was saying how many millions of people WE have to feed in Africa this coming year… I just thought ‘don’t these people ever get to the point of being able to sustain themselves?’ Why is it our job to feed them?

My grandfather replied ‘I’ve come to think they just don’t have the discipline to do it for themselves.’

This family conversation was begun by a reference to the people of Ghana. Ghana was the most prosperous of all the countries when it embarked on freedom in the 1960s. If people in Ghana still eat maggot filled meat and boil giant rats to feed the village, one can only wonder into what depths the rest of the continent has descended.

One Sunday, the church I usually attend had a missionary group come in for a demonstration, and to request donations for their well digging projects in sub-Saharan Africa.

The demonstration included the typical statistics about how many African children die every week from having no water and was intended to make everyone feel bad for living in a wealthy country. Apparently, African children have to drink out of contaminated creeks and rain puddles.

The organizations members (all White) explained how they had designed a special kind of pipe well which could be drilled into the ground rapidly and efficiently.

Near the end of the demonstration my friend leaned over to me and asked something to the effect: ‘I want so badly to ask him why the Africans can’t just dig traditional wells like natives do in the rest of the world. I mean, I feel like you and I with two shovels could dig a well in a couple of days.’

After I thought about this for a moment I decided I had to ask about it… after all, even the Biblical Abraham and Isaac were digging wells 4,000 years ago.

After the demonstration, I went forward and asked the seemingly obvious question. The demonstrator immediately turned sort of confused and vague. He informed me that Africans didn’t usually dig traditional wells because children fall into them, drown, and cause contamination as their bodies decompose. He went on, ‘and the bats fly over and defecate in the water.’

All I could think was ‘is this a series answer?’ Are African children really so stupid they can’t avoid falling into a huge hole and drowning? Are these children suicidal? Are the Africans really incapable of covering their wells at night?

I posed these question to the demonstrator and he couldn’t give me any real answer other than ‘it’s complicated.’

The question must be asked, if Europeans and Mesopotamians can dig traditional wells for thousands of years, until they develop machinery, why can’t modern day Africans do it?

Why didn’t European children fall into traditional wells and drown? Don’t European bats defecate? The problem is not with the situation… it’s with the people.

In 2005 the historian and African expert Martin Meredith wrote a book about the history of African independence entitled: The Fate of Africa: From the Hopes of Freedom, To the Heart of Despair. The subtitle of this book is a pretty fair 10 word summery of the history of the African people’s ability to govern themselves.

We can see what’s happened to South Africa since the fall of Apartheid in 1995. The average personal income in that country has dropped 40% since White rule ended. Today, 25% of allof the men in that country admit they’ve raped a woman! 50 murders occur in South Africa every single day amounting to more than 18,000 a year in a country with a population of 48 million. Germany has around 800 murders a year with a population of 81 million!

The excuse given for South Africa is usually that it was under so many years of White 'opression.' Yet Germany was twice destroyed in this century alone and half the country was looted by the communists for decades before it was finally absorbed into the other half of the nation. Germany today is one of the strongest economies in the world and, and considering its place in the recent debt crisis, is in a position to once again dominate Europe.

Recently, Barack Obama’s own brother, George Obama, wrote a book entitled Homeland: An Extraordinary Story of Hope and Survival.  In the book he documents the dismal state of disarray his own country Kenya is in. George goes so far as claiming that Kenya would have been better off if its people had allowed the Whites to rule over them for a longer period of time:

‘…let me tell you something. Look at South Africa they were under the whites until the 1990s, and look where they are now. They’re practically a developed nation. The corruption there is nothing like it is here. So who is better off? Maybe if we’d let the whites stay a bit longer, we’d be where South Africa is today.’

Even a native Kenyon recognizes that White rule is the key to becoming a successful African state.

Just think how horrible Kenya must be if George Obama can only dream of Kenya being more like South Africa.
One could fill many volumes with the tragedy of post-colonial Africa (and some books no-doubt have been written): endless government instability, unheard tales of corruption, genocides, poverty scarcely imaginable to the Western mind, uncontrolled diseases wiping out millions, never ending civil war, etc, etc.
One particular incident that comes to mind is the former ‘emperor’ of the Central African Empire who loved to feed human flesh to foreign dignitaries without telling them what it was.

Such tales as those that come out of Africa, even from my missionary Uncle, seem too barbarous to be true.
Post European Africa has turned into an entire continent of lawless disorder comparable to the American West of the 19th century. In fact, it’s certainly far worse.
Consider the Democratic Republic of the Congo the largest country in sub-Saharan Africa. This state (if it must be called that) has been more or less at war since 1997 with well over 5 million people left dead so far.
The next largest country in Black Africa is the Sudan. If it’s any indication of the stability of that region the country just split in half in 2011. That separation was the result of the Second Sudanese Civil War which started in 1983 and rages on even as I write these words. Sudan has been more or less at war for the last 30 years and counting.
The third largest ethnically Black government in Africa is Chad. Chad is considered a ‘failed state’ by Fund for Peace. The United Nations has considered Chad to be in a ‘humanitarian crisis’ for the last 11 years. Various armed rebel groups roam the country. In fact, the only reason that any government exists in Chad at all is that it is currently being artificially propped up by the French. 

The country made headlines recently when the latest band of roving Islamic thugs armed with pick axes and Kalashnikovs decided to destroy the ancient tombs in Timbuktu which were formally listed as ‘world heritage sites’ by the United Nations.
Although we could go on evaluating the catastrophe that is post White ruled Africa it would only become redundant.

The whole sub-Saharan racially Black region is home to bands of wandering lawless armed tribes of thugs, rapists, and bandits unconcerned with order or stability. Even the officially recognized ‘leaders’ routinely rob their people and foreign aid groups for the sake of their own greed.
The Council on Foreign Relations states on its website that Africa loses over $150 billion to corruption every year. That number dwarfs the $22.5 billion that the region receives within the same time period from Western generosity.

One might wonder why anyone would bother to throw their compassionate gifts into the black hole that Africa has become. Black African governments currently steal more from their own people then the White European colonialists ever did.
In Africa: A Biography of a Continent the author, John Reader, sums up the post-colonial post-White rule of Africa with this introduction to the final chapter:

‘The Dreams of Africa becoming a continent of peaceful democratic states quickly evaporated [after independence]. More than 70 coups occurred in the first thirty years of independence. By the 1990s few states preserved even the vestiges of democracy. One-party states, presidents-for-life, and military rule became the norm; resources were squandered as the elite accumulated wealth and the majority of Africans suffered. Nigeria and Rwanda exemplify the nightmare; South Africa preserves a flickering hope of transforming dreams into reality.’ (pg. 663).

Reader wrote these words in 1998 only 3 years after South Africa’s rebirth as a Black ruled nation. The hopes he put in South Africa redeeming the continent would be misplaced. As we now know in 2014 South Africa is descending rapidly down to the level of corruption, poverty, and chaos that characterizes its fellow Black ruled African states. The whole of the continent is being enveloped in the nightmare.


Perhaps someone will argue that Africa is poor because of bad geography, perhaps someone will argue that Detroit is ruined because of some kind of American racism. The same arguments cannot be used for Haiti.

Haiti is considered a 'failed state' by the Fund for Peace (FFP).

Haiti has the highest percentage of Black people in the Western Hemisphere – it is also the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere.


I think not.

No one can blame climate/geography for Haiti’s failures as the island sits right next to Puerto Rico, the most developed and richest country in all of Latin America.

Puerto Rico is the Caribbean’s wealthiest country. Does it come as a surprise to anyone that it also has the Caribbean’s Whitest population (White Haitians: 1-3%, White Puerto Ricans:76.2%)?

Although Wikipedia is not always reliant the online encyclopedia opens its article on the Economy of Puerto Rico:

‘Despite its relatively small geographical area and limited availability of natural resources, Puerto Rico's productivity is exceptionally high, having the highest nominal GDP per capita in Latin America,’

I quote Wikipedia not because I get my information from that source, but to demonstrate that anyone can go online and research this data for themselves.

Haiti’s population is 3 times larger than that of Puerto Rico’s. Haiti’s has 3 times the land area of Puerto Rico.

Why, then, is Haiti’s total economic output less than 1/11th that of Puerto Rico’s!?
Another argument used to excuse Africa’s poverty is that Black countries were under colonial rule up until the 1960s. If Whites had granted independence to Black countries earlier on they would be better off today… so the argument goes.
But Haiti has been independent from colonial rule for 212 years. Puerto Rico has been free for 0 years!

To this very day Puerto Rico is still ruled by a colonial power (United States), and yet it is light-years ahead of Haiti.
One last note on Haiti, Haiti is a perfect example of how Marxist economics can’t be blamed for the failure of Black societies. Haiti has embraced the free market to such an extent that leftists routinely blame the countries poverty on capitalism. The country remains in impoverished shambles.

                 High IQ Japanese succeeded in imitating White civilization in Asia.
One might wonder what Japan has to do with Black people. The Japanese serve as a useful contrast to the low intelligence of the Black race.

Even though American Blacks are still undeveloped 500 years after being introduced to civilized society, and Africa is still savage and chaotic even after being nurtured and instructed by the White man for over 150 years, the Japanese essentially recreated a version of Western civilization on their small island in the time between first contact with the West and the era when the West could have conquered and colonized them.

The Portuguese had conducted trade with the Black Africans for slaves since the 16th century. These Africans, however, never developed technologies or learned anything from the superior Europeans. Africans remain in the most primitive state of man until this present day.

In 1854 American Commodore Matthew Perry anchored his armored battleship off the coast of Japan and forced the Japanese to accept trade with the Americans.

Upon seeing the mammoth warship the Japanese realized they were in trouble. They understood that if they didn’t modernize rapidly they would quickly be dominated by the superior Americans.

Unlike the barbarian Blacks, who never had any idea of developing in pace with the Europeans, the Japanese (who possess an average IQ equal to that of Whites) rapidly modernized to the point that only 50 years later they were capable of defeating the Russian Empire in the Russo-Japanese War and establishing themselves as a kind of colonial power in the Far East. They did all of this modernization despite few natural resources and a small geographical land area.

Only racially superior peoples, like Asians and Whites, are capable of sustaining what we now know as Western Civilization. Blacks will hopelessly continue to recreate the heart of darkness as they have since time immemorial.


After reflecting upon history it is impossible to believe that any people group of Black racial ancestry is capable of sustaining White Western institutions, prosperity, and living standards.

In three different situations: the modern post-White flight American city, post-colonial Africa, and long liberated Haiti Blacks as a race have miserably failed to maintain White Western civilization.

In every one of these situation thriving and well constructed societies were simply given away to Blacks. In the case of Detroit arguably the most prosperous city within the most prosperous country was given away to the most prosperous Blacks in the world and within a couple of decades it has become a post-apocalyptic cesspool.

In Africa, Europeans constructed entire workable modern societies from wild untamed wilderness (Africa was a blank spot on the map).

These White colonialists constructed something out of nothing and then gave what they had built back to the Black inhabitants. It was perhaps the largest free gift in world history. Within decades the Black populations, simply handed an entire continent, have all but destroyed Africa plunging it into chaos and forcing Whites to once again pick up the dropped ball and feed billions of their starving children.

How can we imagine, after witnessing such catastrophic collapses of anything subjected to the Black races management, that any semblance of Western Civilization can be maintained by that people group?

Everywhere Blacks live they recreate Africa, whether it’s Haiti or Detroit. Giving our civilization over to the Blacks is like deciding that Africa (that nightmare) is the societal model of the future.

School children are always told that the reason they must learn History is because ‘those that do not know history are doomed to repeat it.’ The lesson of what White Westerners should not repeat has never been more clearly spelled out for them than when considering the multicultural situation. To leave America in the hands of minorities, and specifically Blacks, is nothing short of committing civilizational suicide.

heir have been few people capable of summing up so neatly the threat which Blacks pose to American civilization than U.S. Senator Theodore Bilbo:

‘If our buildings, our highways, and our railroads should be wrecked, we could rebuild them. If our cities should be destroyed, out of the very ruins we could erect newer and greater ones. Even if our armed might should be crushed, we could rear sons who would redeem our power. But if the blood of our White race should become corrupted and mingled with the blood of Africa, then the present greatness of the United States of America would be destroyed and all hope for civilization would be as impossible for a Negroid America as would be redemption and restoration of the Whiteman's blood which had been mixed with that of the Negro.’


9 TRILLION Dollars were stolen by jewish bankers from US Federal Reserve System.

The Federal Reserve has kinda, sorta misplaced $9,000,000,000,000 as shown by a recent video surfaced on you tube (see video below). Your tax money is being stolen. No one at the federal reserve is keeping track of what happened to 9 trillion dollars.

With black budgets and under the table deals can we just guess where all the money has gone? Into the pockets of the Bilderberg fortune 100 attendees. We provided detailed evidence the organization exists with actual documents from their conference recently released to us! Read the documents at Unusual Bilderberg Documents Uncovered at Georgetown University.

So thats $28,125 roughly stolen from every American citizen. Its time for a class action lawsuit . The Federal Reserve is private isn't it?

Rep. Alan Grayson questioned the Federal reserve Inspector General where $9 Trillion dollars went... um...ahhh...err Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman hasn't a clue...Kinda misplaced it did you?

And who controls Federal reserve system – JEWS!!!

The current head of FED is Janet Yellen. She was born to a Jewish family in Brooklyn, New York, the daughter of Anna (née Blumenthal) and Julius Yellen.

Yellen’s ascent to the post will also guarantee that, by the end of her first term, Jews will have occupied the Fed’s top post for three decades straight – an unprecedented run of Jewish power and influence. The chairman’s seat hasn’t been occupied by a non-Jew since 1987, when Alan Greenspan was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to follow Paul Volcker. With the succession of Ben Bernanke in 2006, under President George W. Bush, and now the appointment of Yellen by President Barack Obama, it’s worth remembering that there is a concept in Jewish thought called chazakah: When something happens three times, it can be considered permanent. Applied to the Federal Reserve, it would suggest an impossibly firm grasp on a degree of power the likes of which the Jewish people were always known for.

Of the seven(7) Federal Reserve Board governors, four(4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 57%. Of the twelve(12) Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, four(4) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 33%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times(1,650 percent).

* Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
* Goldman Sachs Bank of New York
* Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York/Shearson American Express
* Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
* Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy
* Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam
* Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
* Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (David Rockefeller)

This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a "CHIT CHAT AROUND THE TABLE DURING INTERMISSION," at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the dairy of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, a delegate from South Carolina. "I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. The menace, gentlemen, is the Jews. In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other people not of their race. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in their Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives our substance and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

The last President to stand up to these plotting money terrorists was John F. Kennedy and he was killed. He, like Abe Lincoln, printed Treasury greenbacks, bypassing the Fed with its bogus “Federal Reserve Notes.” Before their heroic acts there was brave President Andrew Jackson.

Jackson told the bankers in his inaugural speech, “I will rout you out.” And so he did. Once in office he killed the National Bank, the same as today’s Fed. On a memorial near his gravesite marker in Tennessee is an epitaph for Jackson. It reads: “I killed the bank.”

Today, we need to emulate “Old Hickory” by killing the Fed. With it should go every one of these lying, devilish big Jew banks—JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, CitiCorp, et al. Only then will America, and you and I, be free.

Everyone must remember that Russia is still red.

Vladimir Putin reinstated the Soviet-era red star as the Russian military's official emblem--in the latest reincarnation of Communist symbols that has sparked fears of a return to the repressive past... On Putin's initiative, the Russian parliament earlier resurrected the music of the old Soviet anthem, albeit with a new words, and brought back the Soviet-era red banner as the military's flag. Portraits of Lenin and Stalin were openly paraded through Russian streets to mark Defender of the Fatherland Day.

Russian main holiday and historical event is "victory" over Germany in second World War and "liberation" of Europe. I suppose, I don't have to remind everyone about mass rape and murder of millions of white people by red commisars after that "liberation". The heroic legacy of “the country that defeated fascism” is crucial to the Russian identity that Putin is attempting to form with the help of state-controlled media and historians. The Soviet Union’s victory in the World War II, dubbed “The Great Patriotic War,” is an everyday reason for glorifying the Russia of today as an “invincible nation.” Holding the commemorative ceremonies for the end of WWII not in Moscow would be a crucial blow to the Russia’s present historiographical myth.

But I have to remind everyone that Russia is responsible for creation of holocaust myth, because all Nazi "death" camps were in Soviet occupation zone. It was Russian prosecutor who stated during Nuremnberg trial that they have evidence about mass murder of 4 million people, in Auschwiz, millions of people in other "death camps" and at least 2 millions of Jews by SS Sonderkommandos on the territory of USSR. No credible evidence were given to the tribunal, but no one really care about that, and holocaust myth was created.

As for the promotion of national pride, this "national pride" that Putin promotes is in fact just the worship of multicultural and multiracial nature of Russia. The focal point of this "national pride" is the cult of Soviet victory "against the evil Nazis who wanted to kill poor Jews".

So, the cult of Soviet victory is a tool for political correctness and repression of any pro-white and nationalist elements. It claims that fascism is the worst enemy of civilization and Putin linked fascism of the past with the modern nationalists. It justifies actions like this.
It serves as the foundational paradigm and legitimization for thought crimes and "anti-fascist" / "anti-racist" (anti-white) hysteria and can be considered as the twin tool of holocaustianity.

Holocaust revisionism in Russia is banned because of Jewish and Judeophilic power of the Russian government. The Ministry of Education included the holocaust in the curriculum schools in Russia. This theory is just a cheap pseudo-argument to keep Putinphilia constant. According to Ian Kagedan, holocaust memoir is central to the New World Order:

Calling Russian nationalists "CIA / Mossad operations" without proofs is pathetic. Even Putin and his huge police state, despite 24/7/364 surveillance of all nationalist activists of any importance, have never found any such proof or even proposed this as a theory. Putin himself makes no secret why nationalists are persecuted in his country: he hates and fears the "bacteria of nationalism".

Putin is a strong supporter of a multicultural and multiracial Russia. The ideologies of NS and WN are in fundamental opposition with his agenda. Putin's first direct steps against nationalism started in the early part of 2000s. Putin´s Russia applied laws against "thought crimes", including the Federal Law on Counteracting Extremist Activity which was introduced by Putin personally in 2002. As a result of these laws, hundreds of people are now prosecuted annually for these thought crimes, including sharing a NS/ WN song or a pro-white video in social networks. Many of these people are youngsters and students who exchange opinions or video clips online in social networks and don´t belong to any (nationalist) organization.

Are they prosecuted for being CIA agents? The Russian government banned thousands of materials (NS / WN books, songs, holocaust revisionist works, etc.) and created the "Federal List of Extremist Materials" as blacklist which register these banned items. Did the Russian government blacklisted thousands of NS / WN books, songs and other materials and registered them to the Federal List of Extremist Materials because they were written by CIA agents? No, because Putin´s Russia is red and anti-white regime.

Red Russia continue to serve its zionist masters. During a March 4, 2014 news conference, Putin called the anti-Yanukovych protesters “reactionary anti-Semitic forces.” The Putin has repeatedly cited the alleged anti-Semitism of Ukrainian nationalists in justifying Russia’s 2014 annexation of the Ukraine-controlled Crimea. In January, 2015, Putin inveighed against Ukrainian nationalists — he called them “Banderites,” a reference to the Ukrainian Nationalist and anti-Semite Stepan Bandera (during WWII Bandera lead Ukrainian nationalist forces against Soviet Russia). Putin have said that during a speech he delivered on International Holocaust Memorial Day, when he was Lazar’s guest at Moscow’s Jewish museum. PUTIN OPENLY STATED THAT HE ANNEXED CRIMEA AND INVADED IN UKRAINE (100% WHITE COUNTRY) TO FIGHT AGAINST RADICAL NATIONALISTS AND ANTI-SEMITIC FORCES.

Putin wants to erase the borders with former Soviet states by creating an Eurasian Union. He once declared that “Collapse of the Soviet Union was a major geopolitical disaster of the century.” It seems that he wants to rebuild the Soviet Union or at least he wants to build a neo-Soviet Union and restore Soviet zone of control in Europe. Putin restored Soviet ‘Hero of Labour’ title and compared the corpse of Lenin to Christian relics.

With jewish president and jewish prime-minister, Russia can try to "liberate" Europe again, if zionist plan to destroy Europe from inside won't work. They didn't even try to hide this. On the Rossiya 1 news channel, a Kremlin-backed television presenter Dmitry Kiselyov, a leading TV personality on state-controlled Rossiya 1 television, made the incendiary comments on his weekly prime time news show has warned that Russia could turn the United States into "radioactive dust" in the wake of the Crimean referendum. Ge stated that: "Russia is the only country in the world realistically capable of turning the United States into radioactive ash," Kiselyov said standing in front of a large screen depicting a mushroom cloud produced by a nuclear explosion.

A militarized offensive on the EU and US is becoming mainstream in the Russian internal narrative. It is part of a warmongering propaganda narrative that creates the image of an external enemy. In Putin’s own words from 27 December 2014, NATO and the West are Russia’s greatest enemies towards which Russia is ready to use precision weapons, landing in one pot with North Korea which also regularlymilitarily threatens the US. Russian War Propaganda threatens to invade Warsaw, Berlin, London. One of Putin's propaganda channels is threatening to conduct a victory march in all of Europe's capitals on the nearest May 9 (when Russia celebrates Victory over Nazi Germany). This episode was aired on Channel 5, a St. Petersburg based channel that broadcasts nationwide. The channel's employees calculated that the Russian army only needs a few days to reach Berlin and prepare it for the victory march. At the end, the voiceover hints that Russia can use its nuclear missile launchers.

The image of an external enemy is crucial to securing Putin’s position, as well as justifying Russia’s own military aggression. The average Russian, like the average North Korean, is called to believe that he/she is living in a country that is surrounded by enemies and is forced to strike back. Apart from that, it is a great explanation for sanctions: it isn’t Russia that invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea, it is the West that is being aggressive towards Russia.